MILAN -- Global warming killed 150,000 people in 2000

Discuss and find out about new and recent advancements in Biology

Moderators: Happydadtoo, DolphinDude

MILAN -- Global warming killed 150,000 people in 2000

Postby DolphinDude » Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:36 pm

MILAN -- Global warming killed 150,000 people in 2000, and the death toll could double again in the next 30 years if current trends are not reversed, the World Health Organization said Thursday.

One heat wave killed 20,000 people in Europe alone this year, the WHO said, launching a book on health-weather links at a U.N. environment conference.

Climate change, linked by scientists to human emissions of gases such as carbon dioxide from cars and factories, is causing more frequent floods and droughts and melting ice caps.

"An estimated 150,000 deaths ... were caused in the year 2000 due to climate change," the study said. A further 5.5 million healthy years of life were lost worldwide due to debilitating diseases caused by climate change, it said.

"The 1990s were the hottest decade on record, and the upward trend in the world's temperature does not look like it is abating," it said. "In Europe this past summer, for example, an estimated 20,000 people died due to extremely hot temperatures."

The situation will worsen if climate trends continue, WHO experts said at a news conference to launch the book.

"We see an approximate doubling in deaths and in the burden in healthy life years lost" by 2030, said WHO scientist Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum.

The book estimated climate change was to blame for 2.4 percent of cases of diarrhea because, Campbell-Lendrum said, the heat would exacerbate bacterial contamination of food.

Climate change was also behind 2 percent of all cases of malaria, because increased rainfall created new breeding grounds for mosquitoes, which carry the disease, he said.

But he acknowledged global deaths from climate change were minuscule compared with the total number of deaths a year, which the WHO puts at 56 million. About 10 times more people die each year from tobacco-linked illness, he said.

"That doesn't make it more acceptable, and the fact is, it's likely to get worse," he said. "One of the points about climate change is that people who are affected by it don't have the choice to stop smoking."

While halting global warming was the only long-term cure, immediate actions to fight disease and improve access to health services would also help, Campbell-Lendrum said.

The 180-nation conference in Milan is trying to work out ways to slow climate change, mainly via the United Nations' Kyoto protocol, which aims to curb emissions of greenhouse gases.

Not all scientists were convinced by the study, especially by the link it draws between warming and malaria.

"It is naive to predict the effects of 'global warming' on malaria on the mere basis of temperature," Paul Reiter, a professor at Paris's Pasteur Institute, said in a statement.

"Why don't we devote our resources to tackling these diseases directly, instead of spending billions in vain attempts to change the weather?"

Source: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0, ... tophead_10
User avatar
DolphinDude
Chordata
Chordata
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:27 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Postby Frontier Biologist » Thu Mar 25, 2004 12:12 pm

At least we never have to worry about the whole world flooding due to global warming. to be able to flood the entire world up to the top of Mount Everest would take THREE TIMES all the water in the oceans, streams, lakes rivers etc, all the water in the rocks, all the water in the atmosphere and all the water in the polar ice caps put together which naturally is impossible.
User avatar
Frontier Biologist
Platyhelmin
Platyhelmin
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 10:56 am
Location: Milton Keynes - UK


Return to Biology News/Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beickemnege and 0 guests

cron