Ecosystems
[back to top]

Ecology is the study of inter-relationships between organisms and their environment. Its aim it to explain why organisms live where they do. To do this ecologists study ecosystems, areas that can vary in size from a pond to the whole planet.

Estimating Populations and Distribution  [back to top]

To study the dynamics of a population, or how the distribution of the members of a population is influenced by a biotic or an abiotic factor, it is necessary to estimate the population size.  In other words, it will be necessary to count the number of individuals in a population.  Such counting is usually carried out by taking samples.

One of the most fundamental problems faced by community and population ecologists is that of measuring population sizes and distributions. The data is important for comparing differences between communities and species.  It is necessary for impact assessments (measuring effects of disturbance) and restoration ecology (restoring ecological systems).  It is also used to set harvest limits on commercial and game species (e.g. fish, deer, etc.). 

In most cases it is either difficult or simply not possible to census all of the individuals in the target area.  The only way around this problem is to estimate population size using some form of sampling technique.  There are numerous types of sampling techniques.  Some are designed for specific types of organisms (e.g. plants vs. mobile animals).  As well there are numerous ways of arriving at estimates from each sampling technique.  All of these procedures have advantages and disadvantages.  In general, the accuracy of an estimate depends on 1) the number of samples taken, 2) the method of collecting the samples, 3) the proportion of the total population sampled.  

Sampling is viewed by statistical ecologists as a science in its own right.  In most cases, the object is to collect as many randomly selected samples as possible (so as to increase the proportion of the total population sampled).  The accuracy of an estimate increases with the number of samples taken.  This is because the number of individuals found in any given sample will vary from the number found in other samples.  By collecting numerous samples, the effect of these variations can be averaged out.  The purpose for collecting the samples randomly is to avoid biasing the data.  Data can become biased when individuals of some species are sampled more frequently, or less frequently, than expected at random.  Such biases can cause the population size to be either over estimated or under estimated, and can lead to erroneous estimates of population size. 

Population size generally refers to the number of individuals present in the population, and is self-explanatory.  Density refers to the number of individuals in a given area.  For ecologists density is usually a more useful measure.  This is because density is standardized per unit area, and therefore, can be correlated with environmental factors or used to compare different populations.

The spatial distribution of a population is a much more complicated matter.  Basically, there are three possible types of spatial distributions (dispersions) (see diagrams below).  In a random dispersion, the locations of all individuals are independent of each other.  In a uniform dispersion, the occurrence of one individual reduces the likelihood of finding another individual nearby.  In this case the individuals tend to be spread out as far from each other as possible.  In a clumped dispersion, the occurrence of one individual increases the likelihood of finding another individual nearby.  In this case, individuals tend to form groups (or clumps).

Ecologists are often interested in the spatial distribution of populations because it provides information about the social behaviour and/or ecological requirements of the species.  For example, some plants occur in clumped distributions because they propagate by rhizomes (underground shoots) or because seed dispersal is limited.  Clumped distributions in plants may also occur because of slight variations in soil chemistry or moisture content. Many animals exhibit rather uniform distributions because they are territorial (especially birds), expelling all intruders from their territories.  Random distributions are also common, but their precise cause is more difficult to explain.

Unfortunately, it is often difficult to visually assess the precise spatial distribution of a population.  Furthermore, it is often useful to obtain some number (quantitative measure) that describes spatial distribution in order to compare different populations.  For this reason, there are a variety of statistical procedures that are used to describe spatial distributions.

Communities are assemblages of many species living in a common environment.  Interactions between species can have profound influences of their distributions and abundances.  Comprehensive understanding of how species interact can contribute to understanding how the community is organized.  One way to look at species interactions is to evaluate the level of association between them.  Two species are said to be positively associated if they are found together more often than expected by chance.  Positive associations can be expected if the species share similar microhabitat needs or if the association provides some benefit to one (commensualisms) or both (mutualism) of the species involved.  Two species are negatively associated if they are found together less frequently than expected by chance.  Such a situation can arise if the species have very different microhabitat requirements, or if one species, in some way, inhibits the other.  For example, some plants practice allelopathy, the production and release of chemicals that inhibit the growth of other plant species.  Allelopathy results in a negative association between the allelopathic species and those species whose growth is inhibited. 

Random sampling with quadrats  [back to top]

The quadrat method is used primarily in studies of plant populations, or where animals are immobile.  The principal assumptions of this technique are that the quadrats are chosen randomly, the organisms do not move from one quadrat to another during the census period, and that the samples taken are representative of the population as a whole.  It is often conducted by dividing the census area into a grid.  Each square within the grid is known as a quadrat and represents the sample unit. Quadrats are chosen at random by using a random number generator or a random number table to select coordinates.  The number of individuals of the target species is then counted in each of the chosen quadrats.

Ecologists use units to measure organisms within the quadrats.  Frequency (f) is an indication of the presence of an organism in a quadrat area.  This gives no measure of numbers, however the usual unit is that of density – the numbers of the organisms per unit area.  Sometimes percentage cover is used, an indication of how much the quadrat area is occupied.

Counting along Transects   [back to top]

Transects are used to describe the distribution of species in a straight line across a habitat.  Transects are particularly useful for identifying and describing where there is a change in habitat.  A simple line transect records all of the species which actually touch the rope or tape stretched across the habitat.  A belt transect records all the species present between two lines, and an interrupted belt transect records all those species present in a number of quadrats places at fixed points along a line stretched across the habitat.

Mark-release-recapture techniques for more mobile species  [back to top]

This method of sampling is most useful when dealing with an animal population that moves around.  Ecologists must always ensure minimum disturbance of the organism if results are to be truly representative and that the population will behave as normal.   In this method individual organisms are captured, unharmed, using a quantitative technique.  They are counted and then discretely marked or tagged in some way, and then released back into the environment. After leaving time for dispersal, the population is then recaptured, and another count is made.  This gives the number of marked animals and the number unmarked.   This can allow ecologists to estimate of the entire population in a given habitat.

Diversity  [back to top]

Diversity depends on the number of species (species richness of a community) in an ecosystem and the abundance of each species – the number of individuals of each species.  The populations of an ecosystem can support demands on abiotic and biotic factors.  The growth of populations depends on limiting factors:

• Abiotic factors

  • physiological adaptations of organisms only allow them to live in a certain range of pH, light, temp etc – it is part of what defines their niche.

• Biotic factors (interactions between organisms)

  • Intraspecific competition occurs between individuals of the same species eg for a patch of soil to grow on, or a nesting site or food.

  • Interspecific competition occurs between different species needing the same resource – at the same trophic level.

  • Plant species compete for light, herbivore species compete for plants or carnivore species compete for prey

  • Predation – a predator is a limiting factor on growth on the population of its prey and the prey is a limiting factor on the predator population

An index of diversity is used as a measure of the range and numbers of species in an area.  It usually takes into account the number of species present and the number of individuals of each species.  It can be calculated by the following formulae:

 Where:  N = total number of organisms of all species in the area
               d = index of diversity
              n = total number of organisms of each species in the area
e.g.

 In another pond there were:

 In extreme environments the diversity of organisms is usually low (has a low index number).  This may result in an unstable ecosystem in which populations are usually dominated by abiotic factors.  The abiotic factor(s) are extreme and few species have adaptations allowing them to survive.  Therefore food webs are relatively simple, with few food chains, or connections between them – because few producers survive.  This can produce an unstable ecosystem because a change in the population of one species can cause big changes in populations of other species.

In less hostile environments the diversity of organisms is usually high (high index number).  This may result in a stable ecosystem in which populations are usually dominated by biotic factors, and abiotic factors are not extreme.  Many species have adaptations that allow them to survive, including many plants/producers.  Therefore food webs are complex, with many inter-connected food chains.  This results in a stable ecosystem because if the population of one species changes, there are alternative food sources for populations of other species.

Population Ecology  [back to top]

Population Ecology is concerned with the question: why is a population the size it is? This means understanding the various factors that affect the population.

Population Growth  [back to top]

When a species is introduced into a new environment its population grows in a characteristic way. This growth curve is often seen experimentally, for example bees in a hive, sheep in Tasmania, bacteria in culture. The curve is called a logistic or sigmoid growth curve.

The growth curve has three phases, with different factors being responsible for the shape of each phase. The actual factors depend on the ecosystem, and this can be illustrated by considering two contrasting examples: yeast in a flask (reproducing asexually), and rabbits in a field (reproducing sexually).

At the end of phase 3 the population is stable. This population is called the carrying capacity of the environment (K), and is the maximum population supported by a particular ecosystem.

Factors Affecting Population Size  [back to top]

Many different factors interact to determine population size, and it can be very difficult to determine which factors are the most important. Factors can be split into two broad group: abiotic factors and biotic factors. We’ll look at 7 different factors.

1.   Abiotic Factors

The population is obviously affected by the abiotic environment such as: temperature; water/humidity; pH; light/shade; soil (edaphic factors); mineral supply; current (wind/water); topography (altitude, slope, aspect); catastrophes (floods/fire/frost); pollution. Successful species are generally well adapted to their abiotic environment.

In harsh environments (very cold, very hot, very dry, very acid, etc.) only a few species will have successfully adapted to the conditions so they will not have much competition from other species, but in mild environments lots of different species could live there, so there will be competition. In other words in harsh environments abiotic factors govern who survives, while in mild environments biotic factors (such as competition) govern who survives.

2.   Seasons

Many abiotic factors vary with the seasons, and this can cause a periodic oscillation in the population size.

This is only seen in species with a short life cycle compared to the seasons, such as insects. Species with long life cycles (longer than a year) do not change with the seasons like this.

3.   Food Supply

4.   Interspecific Competition

Interspecific competition is competition for resources (such as food, space, water, light, etc.) between members of different species, and in general one species will out-compete another one. This can be demonstrated by growing two different species of the protozoan Paramecium in flasks in a lab. They both grow well in lab flasks when grown separately, but when grown together P.aurelia out-competes P.caudatum for food, so the population of P.caudatum falls due to interspecific competition:

5.      Intraspecific Competition

Intraspecific competition is competition for resources between members of the same species. This is more significant than interspecific competition, since member of the same species have the same niche and so compete for exactly the same resources.

Intraspecific competition tends to have a stabilising influence on population size. If the population gets too big, intraspecific population increases, so the population falls again. If the population gets too small, intraspecific population decreases, so the population increases again:

 Intraspecific competition is also the driving force behind natural selection, since the individuals with the “best” genes are more likely to win the competition and pass on their genes. Some species use aggressive behaviour to minimise real competition. Ritual fights, displays, threat postures are used to allow some individuals (the “best”) to reproduce and exclude others (the “weakest”). This avoids real fights or shortages, and results in an optimum size for a population.

6.   Predation

The populations of predators and their prey depend on each other, so they tend to show cyclical changes. This has been famously measured for populations of lynx (predator) and hare (prey) in Canada, and can also be demonstrated in a lab experiment using two species of mite: Eotetranchus (a herbivore) and Typhlodromus (a predator). If the population of the prey increases, the predator will have more food, so its population will start to increase. This means that more prey will be eaten, so its population will decrease, so causing a cycle in both populations:

7.   Parasitism and Disease

Parasites and their hosts have a close symbiotic relationship, so their populations also oscillate. This is demonstrated by winter moth caterpillars (the host species) and wasp larvae (parasites on the caterpillars). If the population of parasite increases, they kill their hosts, so their population decreases. This means there are fewer hosts for the parasite, so their population decreases. This allows the host population to recover, so the parasite population also recovers:

A similar pattern is seen for pathogens and their hosts.

The Ecological Niche  [back to top]

A population’s niche refers to its role in its ecosystem. This usually means its feeding role in the food chain, so a particular population’s niche could be a producer, a predator, a parasite, a leaf-eater, etc. A more detailed description of a niche should really include many different aspects such as its food, its habitat, its reproduction method etc, so gerbils are desert seed-eating mammals; seaweed is an inter-tidal autotroph; fungi are asexual soil-living saprophytes. Identifying the different niches in an ecosystem helps us to understand the interactions between populations. Members of the same population always have the same niche, and will be well-adapted to that niche, e.g. nectar feeding birds have long thin beaks.

Species with narrow niches are called specialists (e.g. anteater). Many different specialists can coexist in the same habitat because they are not competing, so this can lead to high diversity, for example warblers in a coniferous forest feed on insects found at different heights. Specialists rely on a constant supply of their food, so are generally found in abundant, stable habitats such as the tropics.

Species with broad niches are called generalists (e.g. common crow). Generalists in the same habitat will compete, so there can only be a few, so this can lead to low diversity. Generalists can cope with a changing food supply (such as seasonal changes) since they can switch from one food to another or even one habitat to another (for example by migrating).

The niche concept was investigated in some classic experiments in the 1930s by Gause. He used flasks of different species of the protozoan Paramecium, which eats bacteria.

 It is important to understand the distribution in experiment 2. P. caudatum lives in the upper part of the flask because only it is adapted to that niche and it has no competition. In the lower part of the flask both species could survive, but only P. bursaria is found because it out-competes P. caudatum. If P. caudatum was faster-growing it would be found throughout the flask.

 The niche concept is summarised in the competitive exclusion principle: Two species cannot coexist in the same habitat if they have the same niche. 

Succession  [back to top]

Ecosystems are not fixed, but constantly change with time. This change is called succession. Imagine a lifeless area of bare rock. What will happen to it as time passes?

1.       Very few species can live on bare rock since it stores little water and has few available nutrients. The first colonisers are usually lichens, which have a mutualistic relationship between an alga and a fungus. The alga photosynthesises and makes organic compounds, while the fungus absorbs water and minerals and clings to the rock. Lichens are such good colonisers that almost all “bare rock” is actually covered in a thin layer of lichen. Mosses can grow on top of the lichens. Between them, these colonisers start to erode the rock and so form a thin soil. Colonisers are slow growing and tolerant of extreme conditions.

2.       Pioneer species such as grasses and ferns grow in the thin soil and their roots accelerate soil formation. They have a larger photosynthetic area, so they grow faster, so they make more detritus, so they form better soil, which holds more water.

3.       Herbaceous Plants such as dandelion, goosegrass (“weeds”) have small wind-dispersed seeds and rapid growth, so they become established before larger plants.

4.       Larger plants (shrubs) such as bramble, gorse, hawthorn, broom and rhododendron can now grow in the good soil. These grow faster and so out-compete the slower-growing pioneers.

5.       Trees grow slowly, but eventually shade and out-compete the shrubs, which are replaced by shade-tolerant forest-floor species. A complex food web is now established with many trophic levels and interactions. This is called the climax community.

These stages are called seral stages, or seral communities, and the whole succession is called a sere. Each organism modifies the environment, so creating opportunities for other species. As the succession proceeds the community becomes more diverse, with more complex food webs being supported. The final seral stage is stable (assuming the environment doesn’t change), so succession stops at the climax stage. In England the natural climax community is oak or beech woodland (depending on the underlying rock), and in the highlands of Scotland it is pine forests. In Roman times the country was covered in oak and beech woodlands with herbivores such as deer, omnivores such as bear and carnivores such as wolves and lynxes. It was said that a squirrel could travel from coast to coast without touching ground.

Humans interfere with succession, and have done so since Neolithic times, so in the UK there are few examples of a natural climax left (except perhaps small areas of the Caledonian pine forest in the Scottish Highlands). Common landscapes today like farmland, grassland, moorland and gardens are all maintained at pre-climax stages by constant human interventions, including ploughing, weeding, herbicides, burning, crop planting and grazing animals. These are examples of an artificial climax, or plagioclimax.

• Primary succession starts with bare rock or sand, such as behind a retreating glacier, after a  volcanic eruption, following the silting of a shallow lake or seashore, on a new sand dune, or on rock scree from erosion and weathering of a mountain.

• Secondary succession starts with soil, but no (or only a few) species, such as in a forest clearing, following a forest fire, or when soil is deposited by a meandering river.
  

Energy and Matter  [back to top]

Before studying ecosystems in any further detail, it is important to appreciate the difference between energy and matter. Energy and matter are quite different things and cannot be inter-converted.

• Energy comes in many different forms (such as heat, light, chemical, potential, kinetic, etc.) which can be inter-converted, but energy can never be created, destroyed or used up. If we talk about energy being “lost”, we usually mean as heat, which is radiated out into space. Energy is constantly arriving on earth from the sun, and is constantly leaving the earth as heat, but the total amount of energy on the earth is constant.
• Matter comes in three states (solid, liquid and gas) and again, cannot be created or destroyed. The total amount of matter on the Earth is constant. Matter (and especially the biochemicals found in living organisms) can contain stored chemical energy, so a cow contains biomass (matter) as well as chemical energy stored in its biomass.

All living organisms need energy and matter from their environment. Matter is needed to make new cells (growth) and to create now organisms (reproduction), while energy is needed to drive all the chemical and physical processes of life, such as biosynthesis, active transport and movement.

Food Chains and Webs  [back to top]

The many relationships between the members of a community in an ecosystem can be described by food chains and webs. Each stage in a food chain is called a trophic level, and the arrows represent the flow of energy and matter through the food chain. Food chains always start with photosynthetic producers (plants, algae, plankton and photosynthetic bacteria) because, uniquely, producers are able to extract both energy and matter from the abiotic environment (energy from the sun, and 98% of their matter from carbon dioxide in the air, with the remaining 2% from water and minerals in soil). All other living organisms get both their energy and matter by eating other organisms.

 Although this represents a “typical” food chain, with producers being eaten by animal consumers, different organisms use a large range of feeding strategies (other than consuming), leading to a range of different types of food chain. Some of these strategies are defined below, together with other terms associated with food chains.

So food chains need not end with a consumer, and need not even start with a producer, e.g.:

Ecological Pyramids  [back to top]

In general as you go up a food chain the size of the individuals increases and the number of individuals decreases. These sorts of observations can be displayed in ecological pyramids, which are used to quantify food chains. There are three kinds:

1.         Pyramids of Numbers.  [back to top]

These show the numbers of organisms at each trophic level in a food chain. The width of the bars represent the numbers using a linear or logarithmic scale, or the bars may be purely qualitative. The numbers should be normalised for a given area for a terrestrial habitat (usually m²), or volume for a marine habitat (m³). Pyramids of numbers are most often triangular (or pyramid) shaped, but can be almost any shape. In the pyramids below, A shows a typical pyramid of numbers for carnivores; B shows the effect of a single large producer such as a tree; and C shows a typical parasite food chain.

2.         Pyramids of Biomass  [back to top]

These convey more information, since they consider the total mass of living organisms (i.e. the biomass) at each trophic level. The biomass should be dry mass (since water stores no energy) and is measured in kg m^-2. The biomass may be found by drying and weighing the organisms at each trophic level, or by counting them and multiplying by an average individual mass. Pyramids of biomass are always pyramid shaped, since if a trophic level gains all its mass from the level below, then it cannot have more mass than that level (you cannot weigh more than you eat). The "missing" mass, which is not eaten by consumers, becomes detritus and is decomposed.

3.         Pyramids of Energy  [back to top]

Food chains represent flows of matter and energy, so two different pyramids are needed to quantify each flow. Pyramids of energy show how much energy flows into each trophic level in a given time, so the units are usually something like kJ m^-2 y^-1. Pyramids of energy are always pyramidal (energy cannot be created), and always very shallow, since the transfer of energy from one trophic level to the next is very inefficient The “missing” energy, which is not passed on to the next level, is lost eventually as heat.

Energy Flow in Ecosystems  [back to top]

Three things can happen to the energy taken in by the organisms in a trophic level:

• It can be passed on to the biomass of the next trophic level in the food chain when the organism is eaten.
• It can become stored in detritus. This energy is passed on to decomposers when the detritus decays.
• It can be converted to heat energy by inefficient chemical reactions, radiated by warm bodies, or in friction due to movement. The heat energy is lost to the surroundings, and cannot be regained by living organisms.

These three fates are shown in this energy flow diagram:

 Eventually all the energy that enters the ecosystem will be converted to heat, which is lost to space.

Material Cycles in Ecosystems  [back to top]

Matter cycles between the biotic environment and in the abiotic environment. Simple inorganic molecules (such as CO₂, N₂ and H₂O) are assimilated (or fixed) from the abiotic environment by producers and microbes, and built into complex organic molecules (such as carbohydrates, proteins and lipids). These organic molecules are passed through food chains and eventually returned to the abiotic environment again as simple inorganic molecules by decomposers. Without either producers or decomposers there would be no nutrient cycling and no life.

 The simple inorganic molecules are often referred to as nutrients. Nutrients can be grouped as: major nutrients (molecules containing the elements C, H and O, comprising >99% of biomass); macronutrients (molecules containing elements such as N, S, P, K, Ca and Mg, comprising 0.5% of biomass); and micronutrients or trace elements (0.1% of biomass). Macronutrients and micronutrients are collectively called minerals. While the major nutrients are obviously needed in the largest amounts, the growth of producers is usually limited by the availability of minerals such as nitrate and phosphate.

There are two groups of decomposers:

• Detrivores are animals that eat detritus (such as earthworms and woodlice). They digest much of the material, but like all animals are unable to digest the cellulose and lignin in plant cell walls. They break such plant tissue into much smaller pieces with a larger surface area making it more accessible to the saprophytes. They also assist saprophytes by excreting useful minerals such as urea, and by aerating the soil.

• Saprophytes (or decomposers) are microbes (fungi and bacteria) that live on detritus. They digest it by extracellular digestion, and then absorb the soluble nutrients. Given time, they can completely break down any organic matter (including cellulose and lignin) to inorganic matter such as carbon dioxide, water and mineral ions.

 Detailed material cycles can be constructed for elements such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen or sulphur, or for compounds such as water, but they all have the same basic pattern as the diagram above. We shall only study the carbon and nitrogen cycles in detail.

The Carbon Cycle   [back to top]

 As this diagram shows, there are really many carbon cycles here with time scales ranging from minutes to millions of years. Microbes play the major role at all stages.

• Far more carbon is fixed by microscopic marine producers (algae and phytoplankton) from CO₂ dissolved in the oceans than by terrestrial plants from CO₂ in the air.

• During the Earth's early history (3000 MY ago) photosynthetic bacteria called cyanobacteria changed the composition of the Earth's atmosphere by fixing most of the CO₂ and replacing it with oxygen. This allowed the first heterotrophic cells to use oxygen in respiration.

• A large amount of the fixed carbon is used by marine zooplankton to make calcium carbonate shells. These are not eaten by consumers and cannot easily be decomposed, so turn into carboniferous rocks (chalk, limestone, coral, etc). 99% of the Earth's carbon is in this form.

• The decomposers are almost all microbes such as fungi and bacteria. Most of the detritus is in the form of cellulose and other plant fibres, which eukaryotes cannot digest. Only a few bacteria posses the cellulase enzymes required to break down plant fibres. Herbivorous animals such as cows and termites depend on these bacteria in their guts.

• Much of the CO₂ that was fixed by ferns during the carboniferous era (300 MY ago) was sedimented and turned into fossil fuels. The recent mining and burning of fossil fuels has significantly altered the carbon cycle by releasing the carbon again, causing a 15% increase in CO₂ in just 200 years.

The Nitrogen Cycle  [back to top] 

 Microbes are involved at most stages of the nitrogen cycle:

Nitrogen Fixation. 78% of the atmosphere is nitrogen gas (N₂), but this is inert and can’t be used by plants or animals. Nitrogen fixing bacteria reduce nitrogen gas to ammonia (N₂ + 6H g 2NH₃), which dissolves to form ammonium ions (NH₄⁺ ). This process uses the enzyme nitrogenase and ATP as a source of energy. The nitrogen-fixing bacteria may be free-living in soil or water, or they may live in colonies inside the cells of root nodules of leguminous plants such as clover or peas. This is an example of mutualism as the plants gain a source of useful nitrogen from the bacteria, while the bacteria gain carbohydrates and protection from the plants. Nitrogen gas can also be fixed to ammonia by humans using the Haber process, and a small amount of nitrogen is fixed to nitrate by lightning.

Nitrification. Nitrifying bacteria can oxidise ammonia to nitrate in two stages: first forming nitrite ions NH₄⁺gNO^-₂  then forming nitrate ions NO^-₂gNO^-₃. These are chemosynthetic bacteria, which means they use the energy released by nitrification to live, instead of using respiration. Plants can only take up nitrogen in the form of nitrate.

Denitrification. The anaerobic denitrifying bacteria convert nitrate to N₂ and NO_x, which is then lost to the air. This represents a constant loss of “useful” nitrogen from soil, and explains why nitrogen fixation by the nitrifying bacteria and fertilisers are so important.

Ammonification. Microbial saprophytes break down proteins in detritus to form ammonia in two stages: first they digest proteins to amino acids using extracellular protease enzymes, then they remove the amino groups from amino acids using deaminase enzymes.

Human Impact on the Environment
[back to top]

Ecological Impact of Farming  [back to top]

One of the main reasons for studying ecology is to understand the impact humans are having on the planet. The huge increases in human population over the last few hundred years has been possible due to the development of intensive farming, including monoculture, selective breeding, huge farms, mechanisation and the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides. However, it is apparent that this intensive farming is damaging the environment and is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain. Some farmers are now turning to environmentally-friendly organic farming. We’ll examine 5 of the main issues and their possible solutions. 

1.         Monoculture

Until the middle of the 20^th century, farms were usually small and mixed (i.e. they grew a variety of crops and kept animals). About a third of the population worked on farms. The British countryside was described by one observer in 1943 as “an attractive patchwork with an infinite variety of small odd-shaped fields bounded by twisting hedges, narrow winding lanes and small woodlands”. Today the picture is quite different, with large uninterrupted areas of one colour due to specialisation in one crop - monoculture. Monoculture increases the productivity of farmland by growing only the best variety of crop; allowing more than one crop per year; simplifying sowing and harvesting of the crop; and reducing labour costs.

However, monoculture has a major impact on the environment:

• Using a single variety of crop reduces genetic diversity and renders all crops in a region susceptible to disease.
• Fertilisers are required to maintain soil fertility. This is expensive and can pollute surrounding groundwater due to leaching.
• Pesticides are required to keep crops healthy. Again this is expensive and potentially polluting.
• Monoculture reduces species diversity. This has many knock-on effects such as allowing a pest species to get out of control, fewer plants due to lack of pollinating insects and loss of species that may be useful to humans.
• Less attractive countryside.

Some farmers are now returning to traditional crop rotations, where different crops are grown in a field each year. This breaks the life cycles of pests (since their host is changing); improves soil texture (since different crops have different root structures and methods of cultivation); and can increase soil nitrogen (by planting nitrogen-fixing legumes).

2.         Hedgerows

Hedges have been planted since Anglo-Saxon times to mark field boundaries and to contain livestock. As they have matured they have diversified to contain a large number of different plant and animal species, some found nowhere else in the UK. Since the Second World War much of the hedgerow has been removed because:

• As mixed farms converted to arable farms, hedgerows are no longer needed to contain livestock.
• Many small farms have been amalgamated into large farms, allowing larger fields, which in turn allows greater mechanisation and lower labour costs. One farmer found that by removing 1.5 miles of hedges, he increased his arable land by 3 acres and reduced harvesting time by one third.
• Hedgerows reduce the space available for planting crops, and their roots compete with those of crops for water and minerals in the soil.
• Hedgerows provide shelter for pests such as rabbits and insects, and they are a reservoir of weeds and disease.
• Hedgerows need to be maintained, which is a skilled job, costing time and money.

However it has now become clear that hedgerows served an important place in the ecology of Britain.

• They provide habitats for at least 30 species of trees and shrubs, 65 species of nesting birds, 1500 species of insects and 600 species of wildflowers. These in turn provide food for small mammals.
• They act as corridors, allowing animals to move safely between woodlands.
• Some of the animals they shelter are predators of plant pests, so they may reduce pests, not increase them.
• They are efficient windbreaks, providing shelter for animals and plants, and reducing soil erosion. During storms in recent years large amounts of topsoil was blown away from large unsheltered fields.
• They provide habitats for pollinating insects, so removing hedgerows can indirectly reduce the populations of other local plant species.
• In the UK we have surpluses of many crops, and farmers can receive grants to reduce their food production.

The importance of hedgerows is now being recognised, and farmers can now receive grants to plant hedgerows. However it takes hundreds of years for new hedgerows to mature and develop the same diversity as the old ones.

3.         Fertilisers

Since the rate of plant growth in usually limited by the availability of  mineral ions in the soil, then adding more of these ions as fertiliser is a simple way to improve yields, and this is a keystone of intensive farming. The most commonly used fertilisers are the soluble inorganic fertilisers containing nitrate, phosphate and potassium ions (NPK). Inorganic fertilisers are very effective but also have undesirable effects on the environment. Since nitrate and ammonium ions are very soluble, they do not remain in the soil for long and are quickly leached out, ending up in local rivers and lakes and causing eutrophication. They are also expensive.

An alternative solution, which does less harm to the environment, is the use of organic fertilisers, such as animal manure (farmyard manure or FYM), composted vegetable matter, crop residues, and sewage sludge. These contain the main elements found in inorganic fertilisers (NPK), but in organic compounds such as urea, cellulose, lipids and organic acids. Of course plants cannot make use of these organic materials in the soil: their roots can only take up inorganic mineral ions such as nitrate, phosphate and potassium. But the organic compounds can be digested by soil organisms such as animals, fungi and bacteria, who then release inorganic ions that the plants can use (refer to the nitrogen cycle). Some advantages of organic fertilisers are:

• Since the compounds in organic fertilisers are less soluble than those in inorganic fertilisers, the inorganic minerals are released more slowly as they are decomposed. This prevents leaching and means they last longer.
• The organic wastes need to be disposed of anyway, so they are cheap. Furthermore, spreading on to fields means they will not be dumped in landfill sites, where they may have caused uncontrolled leaching.
• The organic material improves soil structure by binding soil particles together and provides food for soil organisms such as earthworms. This improves drainage and aeration.

Some disadvantages are that they are bulky and less concentrated in minerals than inorganic fertilisers, so more needs to be spread on a filed to have a similar effect. They may contain unwanted substances such as weed seeds, fungal spores, heavy metals. They are also very smelly!

4.         Pesticides

To farmers, a pest is any organism (animal, plant or microbe) that damages their crops. Some form of pest control has always been needed, whether it is chemical (e.g. pesticides), biological (e.g. predators) or cultural (e.g. weeding or a scarecrow). Chemicals pesticide include:

• herbicides           anti-plant chemicals

• insecticides        anti-insect chemicals

• fungicides           anti-fungal chemicals

• bactericides        anti-bacterial chemicals

Pesticides have to be effective against the pest, but have no effect on the crop. They may kill the pests, or just reduce their population by slowing growth or preventing reproduction. Intensive farming depends completely on the use of pesticides, and some wheat crops are treated with 18 different chemicals to combat a variety of weeds, fungi and insects. In addition, by controlling pests that carry human disease, they have saved millions of human lives. However, with their widespread use and success there are problems, the mains ones being persistence and bioaccumulation.

Both of these are illustrated by DDT (DichloroDiphenylTrichloroethane), an insecticide used against the malaria mosquito in the 1950s and 60s very successfully, eradicating malaria from southern Europe. However the population of certain birds fell dramatically while it was being used, and high concentrations of DDT were found in their bodies, affecting calcium metabolism and causing their egg shells to be too thin and fragile. DDT was banned in developed countries in 1970, and the bird populations have fully recovered. Alternative pesticides are now used instead, but they are not as effective, and continued use of DDT may have eradicated malaria in many more places.

Persistence. This refers to how long a pesticide remains active in the environment. Some chemicals are broken down by decomposers in the soil (they’re biodegradable) and so are not persistent, while others cannot be broken down by microbes (they’re non biodegradable) and so continue to act for many years, and are classed as persistent pesticides. The early pesticides (such DTT) were persistent and did a great deal of damage to the environment, and these have now largely been replaced with biodegradable  insecticides such as carbamates and pyrethroids.

Bioaccumulation (or Biomagnification). This refers to the built-up of a chemical through a food chain. DDT is not soluble in water and is not excreted easily, so it remains in the fat tissue of animals. As each consumer eats a large mass of the trophic level below it, DTT accumulates in the fat tissue of animals at the top of the food chain. This food chain shows typical concentrations of DDT found in a food chain (in parts per million, ppm):

The high concentration of DDT in birds explains why the toxic effects of DDT were first noticed in birds.

5.         Eutrophication

Eutrophication refers to the effects of nutrients on aquatic ecosystems. These naturally progress from being oligotrophic (clean water with few nutrients and algae) to eutrophic (murky water with many nutrients and plants) and sometimes to hypertrophic (a swamp with a mass of plants and detritus). This is in fact a common example of succession. In the context of pollution “eutrophication” has come to mean a sudden and dramatic increase in nutrients due to human activity, which disturbs and eventually destroys the food chain. The main causes are fertilisers leaching off farm fields into the surrounding water course, and sewage (liquid waste from houses and factories). These both contain dissolved minerals, such as nitrates and phosphates, which enrich the water.

 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). This measures the rate of oxygen consumption by a sample of water, and therefore gives a good indication of eutrophication. A high BOD means lots of organic material and aerobic microbes, i.e. eutrophication. The method is simple: a sample of water is taken and its O₂ concentration is measured using an oxygen meter. The sample is then left in the dark for 5 days at 20°C, and the O₂ is measured again. The BOD is then calculated from: original O₂ concentration – final O₂ concentration. The more oxygen used up over the 5 days (in mg.dm^-3) the higher the BOD, and the higher the BOD the more polluted the water is. This table shows some typical BOD values.

 Aquatic ecosystems can slowly recover from a high BOD as oxygen dissolves from the air, but long-term solutions depend on reducing the amount of minerals leaching into the water. This can be achieved by applying inorganic fertilisers more carefully, by using organic fertilisers, by using low-phosphate detergents, and by removing soluble minerals by precipitation in modern sewage plants. As a last resort eutrophic lakes can be dredged to remove mineral-rich sediment, but this is expensive and it takes a long time for the ecosystem to recover. This has been done in the Norfolk Broads.

Deforestation  [back to top]

Human activities often affect whole ecosystems.  There are potential conflicts between the need/wish to produce things useful to humans in the short term and the conservation of ecosystems in the long term.

Forests are the natural climax communities.  They have high diversity, with complex food webs.  Humans have been clearing areas of forest for thousands of years – leading to deforestation over large areas of Europe, Asia and North America.  Recent and present deforestation affects manly tropical rain forests.   Tropical rain forests have been estimated to contain 50% of the world’s standing timber.  They represent a huge store of carbon and sink for carbon dioxide and their destruction may increase atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide by 50%.  They are important in conserving soil nutrients and preventing large-scale erosion in regions of high rainfall.  They contain a large gene pool of plant resources. 

Deforestation leads to the increase in land for agriculture

• Growth in the human population is increasing demand for land for farming.

• Deforestation causes local extinction of species of trees.  This particularly affects hardwoods, which are in demand for timber, and softwoods for making paper.

Deforestation affects diversity

Loss of trees:

• Removes the bases of many food webs

• Removes the habitats of many other species

• Causes local extinction of other populations, or reduction in their size

• Reduced the number of species present and numbers of individuals present

• Reduces diversity

• Leads to a lower biomass and productivity per hectare.

Reducing the diversity produces a less stable and more extreme environment, where abiotic factors also become more extreme.

Deforestation affects carbon and nitrogen cycles

• Means less photosynthesis

• Usually involves burning unwanted trees, and expanding human populations burn more wood for fuel.

• With the trees gone (mainly in tropical rain forests) there has been large scale erosion due to the high rainfall in these area washing away the soil.

• Less carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and more is added.  This adds to the problem of global warming

• In forests, most of the nitrate ions (and other mineral ions) absorbed by plants come from decomposition of organic remains – the ions are recycled

• Many of the decomposing fungi live in association with the roots of trees

• The soil is often a poor source of mineral ions.

Deforestation results in:

• Reduced input to the nitrogen cycle

• Slower and less recycling of nitrates (and other ions)

• Increased loss of nitrates by leeching

The soil loses fertility can support lower numbers and fewer species of plants à lower diversity

Conservation of forests

Conservation involves managing the Earth’s resources so as to restore and maintain a balance between the requirements of humans and those of other species.  Many attempts are being made to encourage sustainable use of forests.  This involves measuring and comparing yields and profits from deforestation with alternative uses.

A study in 1989 (obviously the figures will be much different now) of an Amazon rainforest in Peru showed that each hectare of the forest produces fruit and latex (rubber) with an annual market value of $700.  If, however, the trees are cut down, the total value of their wood is $1000.  Now, trees can only be felled once, but fruit and latex can be harvest every year.  This study into sustainable management can allow governments to be persuaded that more money can be made from rainforests by exploiting them on a sustainable basis than by destroying them, therefore it may be worth their while to preserve them. 

[back to top]

Last updated 27/06/2004